After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories - download pdf or read online

By Robert Nola, Howard Sankey, R. Nola, H. Sankey

ISBN-10: 1402002467

ISBN-13: 9781402002465

ISBN-10: 9401139350

ISBN-13: 9789401139359

A few imagine that matters to do with medical technique are final century's stale debate; Popper used to be an recommend of method, yet Kuhn, Feyerabend, and others are purported to have introduced the controversy approximately its prestige to an finish. The papers during this quantity exhibit that concerns in technique are nonetheless a great deal alive. the various papers reinvestigate matters within the debate over method, whereas others set out new ways that the talk has built within the final decade. The publication can be of curiosity to philosophers and scientists alike within the reassessment it offers of past debates approximately technique and present instructions of study.

Show description

Read Online or Download After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method PDF

Similar epistemology books

Get Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas (2nd PDF

During this impressive number of essays, Isaiah Berlin, one of many nice thinkers of the 20 th century, discusses the significance of dissenters within the historical past of ideas--among them Machiavelli, Vico, Montesquieu, Herzen, and Sorel. along with his strange powers of inventive new edition, Berlin brings to existence unique minds that swam opposed to the present in their times--and nonetheless problem traditional knowledge.

New PDF release: The Philosophy of Animal Minds

This quantity is a set of fourteen essays through major philosophers on matters about the nature, life, and our wisdom of animal minds. the character of animal minds has been a subject matter of curiosity to philosophers because the origins of philosophy, and up to date years have visible major philosophical engagement with the topic.

An enquiry concerning human understanding by David Hume, Peter Millican PDF

David Hume's Enquiry relating Human figuring out is the definitive assertion of the best thinker within the English language. His arguments in help of reasoning from adventure, and opposed to the "sophistry and illusion"of religiously encouraged philosophical fantasies, prompted controversy within the eighteenth century and are strikingly appropriate at the present time, while religion and technological know-how proceed to conflict.

Additional info for After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method

Sample text

P. 230). Carnap's inductive logic also needs supplementing with methodological rules concerning the decisions that are to be made in the light of one's observations and available hypotheses. , sections 50 and 51). THEORIES OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD 17 Such methodological rules, which Carnap must add to his account of inductive logic, go beyond methodology understood merely as the heuristics of theoremproving as in deductive logic. In fact some methodology is required if Carnap's inductive logic is to have any application at all in either scientific or every-day contexts.

That is, the cluster of values are science and paradigm transcendent. (3) The model may be either descriptive or normative. Kuhn does not make it clear whether his model is to be understood as a description of how scientists do in fact make their choices, or whether it is to be understood normatively in that it tells us how we ought to make choices. If the latter then there is a need for a justification of the norms it embodies. (4) Kuhn says that the values may be imprecise and be applied by different scientists in different ways.

For Popper the paradigms of great or heroic science are the laws of Kepler and the theories of Newton and Einstein; instances of disreputable science are those of Marx, Freud and Adler. Popper's new meta-methodological criterion for assessing SMs is the following procedure: any acceptable SM must capture those sciences on the great/heroic list and miss none out (otherwise some other SM might do better); and it must capture none of the sciences on the disreputable list (on pain of refutation). Popper does not say how the two lists are drawn up; but given the lists they constitute a (fallible) foundation against which SMs can be tested in much the same way that scientific observations are a (fallible) foundation against which scientific theories can be tested.

Download PDF sample

After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method by Robert Nola, Howard Sankey, R. Nola, H. Sankey

by Brian

Rated 4.05 of 5 – based on 11 votes